In theory, war has rules. There are Geneva Conventions, Red Cross emblems, press badges, and white-flag protections. There are supposed to be sacred lines that, even amid carnage, hold. But in practice? On the ground, in the dust, in the chaos of cities crumbling under shellfire or streets choking on tear gas? Those lines are smudged at best, erased at worst.
Neutrality, as a military concept, is dying. Maybe it’s already dead.
I. Everyone Is a Combatant Until Cleared
Whether you’re in Gaza or downtown Los Angeles during a protest, the battlefield logic is the same: you are a potential threat until proven otherwise.
This is not conspiracy. This is doctrine.
Speak to anyone who’s operated in a modern conflict zone—from the ruins of Fallujah to the alleys of Jenin—and you’ll hear the same truth whispered between cigarette drags: “There are no civilians. Not really. Not anymore.”
Journalists, NGOs, charity workers, even medical personnel—once protected categories—are now viewed with suspicion by default. And in many theaters, especially asymmetric ones, they’re treated accordingly.
II. The Legacy of Vietnam: Every Child, Every Crone, a Potential Threat
The Vietnam War permanently reshaped American military psychology. The iconic imagery of jungle ambushes and rice-paddy firefights obscures a darker lesson learned in blood: there was no reliable distinction between civilian and enemy.
The Viet Cong didn’t wear uniforms. Children and elderly women were used as spotters, couriers, even suicide bombers. The enemy bled into the populace so thoroughly that American soldiers, French colonial officers before them, and later, Iraqi and Israeli forces, all internalized the same maxim:
The next fruit basket could be wired to blow.
The result? Hesitation could mean death. Innocence became a luxury few soldiers could afford to presume.
III. JSOC Knows: The War Doesn’t Start When the Bullets Fly
A close friend of mine—a retired lieutenant colonel who served in the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and was embedded with a JSOC team flying in Little Birds over Iraq—put it this way:
“On the ground, we never assumed an NGO was neutral. That’s a civilian cover until proven otherwise. And journos? Forget it. They might be stringing for Al Jazeera or feeding coordinates. You clear a contact when you can. Not before.”
He wasn’t being cruel. He was being precise. In his world, the press vest was not a shield—it was a signal to vet harder.
This attitude isn’t unique. It’s endemic to every theater of modern war. Because the modern battlefield isn’t bound by clear lines or flags. It’s networked. It’s narrative-driven. And the enemy understands optics better than most generals do.
IV. The IDF Model: Ruthless Efficiency
Among Western-style militaries, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) exemplify the logical extreme of this doctrine. Israel doesn’t pretend civilians are civilians when they might be logistics nodes for Hamas. It doesn’t wait for journalists to prove whether they’re carrying mics or mortars.
The infamous case of Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, killed in the West Bank, illustrates this brutal pragmatism. So do multiple strikes on aid convoys, press buildings, and even medical facilities in Gaza. Israel’s doctrine is simple:
If it smells like a threat, shoot. Then investigate.
And while many condemn it internationally, few Western soldiers—especially American—can deny the utility of such a model. Israel does what U.S. troops in Afghanistan and Iraq wished they could do: act first, without a lawyer breathing down their neck.
V. Gaza: The Final Collapse of Civilian Identity
Gaza, perhaps more than any place on Earth, illustrates the full breakdown of civilian protection. Half the population is under 18. Schools store rockets. Mosques serve as staging grounds. Apartment buildings become command posts.
But that doesn’t mean every Gazan is a militant. It just means that in the fog of war, no soldier can afford to assume they’re not.
This isn’t a moral judgment—it’s a structural one. When the terrain, population, and logistics are all blended, war logic fills in the blanks:
If you’re not fighting the insurgents in your neighborhood, maybe you are the insurgents.
That logic may be unfair, cruel, even genocidal in its implications. But it is the logic of war. And no army immune to casualties is immune to it.
VI. From MAS*H to Mosul: The Death of the White Helmet
The romantic era of medics and journalists as sacred actors—untouchable, unarmed, unimpeachable—is over.
We live in the age of drone strikes on Red Crescent hospitals. Of tear gas into medical tents at Standing Rock. Of embedded journalists leaking troop movements. Of riot cops shooting rubber bullets into crowds of clearly labeled press.
In Los Angeles, during the ICE protests, an Australian journalist was hit in the leg with a rubber bullet live on air. In Ferguson, medics were tackled. In Ukraine, press convoys are shelled as often as tanks.
No badge, no vest, no emblem is universally respected. Not anymore.
VII. Everyone Carries a Narrative Weapon
Why this shift? Because narrative is now part of the battlespace.
A medic with a GoPro can do more damage to a regime’s legitimacy than an RPG. A journalist with a drone can feed targeting data. An aid worker with a social media following can shift global opinion in real-time.
This is war in the age of livestreams and hashtags. And in that space, every actor becomes a potential amplifier of enemy power.
So they’re treated accordingly.
VIII. The Uncomfortable Truth: Civilians Still Suffer—But They’re Not Sacred
This isn’t an apologia for war crimes. It’s a diagnosis. Civilians still die in horrific numbers. But the idea that they are somehow insulated from the logic of total war is increasingly a fiction.
In Gaza, in Afghanistan, in Ukraine, in American cities—once the state activates its war reflex, everyone is scanned for threat potential. Not moral worth. Not innocence. Threat potential.
IX. Final Thought: We’re All in Uniform Now
The collapse of the civilian-combatant binary doesn’t just happen in dusty warzones. It’s happening at home. In protests. In drone policy. In police training.
The idea that some people are neutral is no longer operationally valid. We’ve entered an era of total situational distrust—where your vest, patch, or logo doesn’t protect you. It marks you.
In the end, the fog of war isn’t fog at all—it’s a default setting, applied to everyone who enters the arena.
And in that arena, the myth of neutrality is dead.
X. The Resistance That Isn’t
Here’s the other uncomfortable question no one wants to ask: when a population is truly oppressed, truly occupied, truly terrorized by its rulers—where’s the resistance?
In occupied France, resistance fighters blew up train tracks, assassinated collaborators, sabotaged equipment, and took up arms under curfew. In Vietnam, the lines blurred—but the will to resist was everywhere. Even in the U.S., opposition to power has always produced some visible friction: protests, leaks, subversion, sabotage.
So ask yourself: where are the Gazan fraggers? Where are the sabotage cells targeting Hamas, not the IDF? Where are the defectors? The bombings of arms depots, the disappearances of commanders? Are there no French Resistance analogues in Gaza because Hamas is just that effective at repression? Or is it because, deep down, the population has absorbed Hamas into its identity?
In Iraq and Afghanistan, we found translators, allies, internal opposition. Where are they in Gaza? If no one is resisting the terrorist regime, how separate are they from it?
This isn't an accusation—it's an invitation to stop pretending that oppressed populations are always passive victims waiting for a liberator. Sometimes, tragically, they are participants. Or at least, co-survivors in a shared ideology.
If a civilian population truly wanted freedom from its own tyrants, you’d see broken windows on the inside, too.
XI. Your Feed Is Your Uniform
In 2025, your neutrality isn't determined by a press pass or a Geneva lanyard. It's decided by your digital signature—your tweets, your TikToks, your BlueSky takes, your Threads hashtags.
Open-source intelligence (OSINT) has obliterated plausible deniability. No one on the battlefield trusts a flak jacket if they can scroll your profile.
Every operator—from special forces to domestic riot cops—now asks the same question:
“What side is this person on—really?”
And the answer is often found not in the field but in the feed.
A medic with a “Free Palestine” Instagram bio? Red flag.
A journalist who tweeted “ACAB” last summer? Possible partisan.
An NGO worker who signs a public petition calling ICE agents “kidnappers”? You're not neutral anymore.
To the people holding rifles and calling airstrikes, ideology is a battlefield weapon—even if you're just typing. And when you're in a hot zone, everything is intelligence. Even your memes.
You don’t need a rifle to be dangerous. You need reach. Influence. Intent.
XII. What Is a Civilian, Anyway?
In a nation like the United States—with over 400 million privately owned firearms and millions of people with tactical knowledge, survivalist instincts, and a cultural obsession with freedom—the idea of a “civilian” starts to blur.
If America were ever invaded or occupied—a Red Dawn scenario for real—would its civilians be passive, cowering denizens? Or would they be nighttime partisans, operating saltpeter pipe bombs from garages and firing suppressed ARs from second-story windows?
The line between civilian and combatant has never been thinner. Civilians today are:
Technically untrained, but often armed
Not uniformed, but ideologically charged
Not enlisted, but fully enlisted in the culture wars
In the age of total information warfare, low-cost drones, 3D-printed weapons, digital psyops, and narrative control—everyone is a potential threat vector.
The 20th century gave us the myth of the sacred civilian. The 21st is giving us something else:
The digitally active, ideologically exposed, often armed, always analyzed noncombatant.
Which is just a long way of saying: there are no civilians anymore.
Appendix: The Collapse of Neutrality — Fact Checks, Historical Parallels, and Tactical Realities
✅ Fact Check: True
Journalists have been used as intelligence assets — both willingly and unwittingly — in nearly every major 20th and 21st century conflict. (See Operation Mockingbird, Iraq embeds, etc.)
NGOs have been infiltrated or co-opted for espionage or influence operations, including well-documented CIA links to cultural or humanitarian fronts during the Cold War.
Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) is a standard part of modern military and paramilitary operations. Personal posts and ideological affiliations absolutely inform battlefield targeting decisions.
Civilians, including women and children, have been used as bombers, couriers, or insurgents across Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and more.
The Geneva Conventions do not protect combatants or civilians who engage in hostilities without distinction. Once you act like a combatant, you are one, legally and practically.
❌ Fact Check: False
“Medics and journalists are always protected by international law.” — False. They are protected only so long as they remain neutral and uninvolved in hostilities. Violating this invalidates their immunity.
“Only combatants wear uniforms and carry weapons.” — False. Irregular warfare has erased this distinction for decades. Many insurgents use civilian cover precisely to avoid detection.
“Social media expressions are private and don’t matter in warzones.” — False. Digital footprints are battlefield intelligence.
“Gazan civilians are passive victims of Hamas.” — Partially false. While many are victims, the absence of internal resistance raises strategic and ethical questions.
🕰️ Historical Context & Civilian Hostility Examples
🇻🇳 Vietnam War
Civilians planted IEDs and acted as Viet Cong couriers.
Women and children were used to lure and ambush U.S. soldiers.
No clear frontlines; entire villages were “combat zones.”
🇮🇶 Iraq & 🇦🇫 Afghanistan
Local translators and allies existed, but many civilians actively supported insurgents.
Civilian homes used as ammo caches.
IEDs often planted by teenagers or elderly citizens.
🇽🇰 Kosovo
Ethnic Albanian civilians provided shelter, comms, and food to KLA forces.
NGOs were watched closely due to suspected sympathies with fighters.
🇵🇸 Gaza
Schools used for weapons storage.
Civilians celebrate martyrs publicly, creating ideological cover.
Journalists have been caught embedded with militants, intentionally or not.
🇺🇸 United States
George Floyd protests and others saw medics and press directly targeted when believed to be organizing or agitating.
Domestic law enforcement no longer presumes neutrality when ideology is visible.
❓ FAQ: The Gray Zone Explained
Q: Are all civilians combatants now?
A: No—but they are assessed as such until proven otherwise. The battlefield no longer assumes innocence.
Q: Aren’t journalists and medics protected?
A: Only if they remain neutral. If they’re providing intel, shaping narrative, or aiding combatants, they become valid targets.
Q: Why doesn’t Gaza resist Hamas if Hamas is so oppressive?
A: This is the central question. Either fear is total—or Hamas isn’t seen as oppressive by many.
Q: Isn’t this logic justifying war crimes?
A: No. It’s explaining why civilians keep dying in modern war: because the rules don’t match the reality.
Q: Would Americans resist an occupation?
A: Likely yes—and many would do so while technically being "civilians." That’s the point.
📘 Glossary
OSINT (Open Source Intelligence): The use of publicly available information—like social media—to inform targeting or analysis.
NGO (Non-Governmental Organization): Civil society groups, often humanitarian or rights-based. No longer presumed neutral.
Geneva Conventions: A set of treaties governing the conduct of war, including the protection of civilians and non-combatants.
Asymmetric Warfare: Conflict between forces of unequal size or power, where one side uses irregular tactics—like insurgency or guerilla war.
Fragging: A term from the Vietnam War meaning when soldiers turn on or assassinate their own officers or leaders. Used here metaphorically for resistance against internal tyrants.
Narrative Weapon: Any use of storytelling, documentation, or media to influence public perception or morale—considered operationally potent.
Combatant: Any individual actively involved in hostilities. Doesn't have to wear a uniform or be formally enlisted.
Civilian: A non-military person. In modern conflict, this status is conditional, not assumed.
Geneva Immunity: Protection under international law—revoked the moment someone participates in combat.
Red Dawn Scenario: A reference to a fictional U.S. invasion by foreign powers, often cited in discussions of American civilian insurgency.
tl;dr
The provided text argues that neutrality is an obsolete concept in modern warfare, asserting that the lines between civilians and combatants have blurred irrevocably. It explains that, whether in a declared warzone like Gaza or during domestic protests, individuals are often assessed as potential threats until proven otherwise, with their digital footprint serving as a key indicator of allegiance. The document highlights how traditional protections for journalists, medics, and aid workers are eroding, as these roles can be perceived as "narrative weapons" capable of influencing outcomes. Ultimately, the text contends that the "myth of the sacred civilian" has ended, emphasizing that in an era of total situational distrust, everyone entering a conflict zone is analyzed for threat potential, not moral worth.
Share this post