Am I a commie?
Yes—but not the kind anyone warned you about. I don’t believe in ideological purity or party loyalty. I don’t believe in leveling the tall to protect the fragile. I don’t want to abolish excellence, and I don’t believe in turning sacred things into slogans. I’m not interested in orthodoxy, gatekeeping, or revolutionary cosplay. I’m interested in the basic principle that the world should not be built on cruelty.
I believe that dignity is a human right, not a market variable. I believe that no one should be discarded because they can’t produce something measurable on a spreadsheet. I believe suffering should never be made efficient. I believe that nobody should be punished for being poor. That’s it. That’s the core. And that’s what makes me whatever kind of commie Kurt Vonnegut was.
Vonnegut didn’t peddle theory. He told the truth about systems that crush people, and the people who look away. He exposed the fraud of patriotism, the hypocrisy of professional-class benevolence, and the myth that cruelty ever serves a noble purpose. He satirized institutions, yes, but he didn’t stop there. He pointed to a moral baseline beneath the absurdity. Because underneath all the irony was clarity—and when he wrote about Eugene Debs, it wasn’t as a character reference or a name-check. It was reverence. He wasn’t being clever. He had found someone worth believing in.
Debs went to prison for saying that poor men shouldn’t be forced to kill other poor men in Europe to make rich men richer. He campaigned for president from his prison cell and earned nearly a million votes. If Vonnegut ever had a shrine, Debs would’ve been at the center of it—not as a symbol, but as a compass. That’s not about politics. It’s about moral alignment. That’s what I mean when I say I’m a commie.
Over the past decade, I’ve watched what passes for American politics become hollow. I’ve seen justice reduced to compliance rituals, equity turned into corporate HR strategy, and the language of liberation absorbed by institutions designed to neutralize it. The professional class has learned how to speak about power without ever confronting it. The working poor are either ignored or pathologized. Asking the wrong question is now a form of violence, but ordering drone strikes somehow isn’t.
I’ve seen friends lose jobs, reputations, and entire communities because they hesitated before nodding. I’ve seen people like me—people who grew up believing in decency, fairness, and solidarity—labeled fascists simply because we didn’t memorize the latest catechism fast enough. People didn’t ask what changed. They just assumed we had gone bad. But the truth is simpler: we didn’t change. The Left did.
In 2016, I became anti-anti-Trump. Not because I liked him, but because the opposition had become everything I used to resist. It wasn’t about justice—it was about performance. It wasn’t about wages or housing or war—it was about posture, language, and branding. I saw an opposition that hated populism more than it hated inequality. I saw a culture more disturbed by rudeness than by endless war or corporate corruption. And I realized that if the people with all the right slogans aren’t talking about healthcare, housing, food, and labor, then they’re not on the side of the people. They’re managing perception. They’re defending a class.
That’s not my politics. That’s not my Left. That’s not my kind of communism.
My kind of communism starts with material reality. Feed the worker. House the family. Care for the sick. End the war. Hold the liar accountable. Don’t let cruelty become polite. And don’t mistake etiquette for ethics. If your movement can’t start there, I don’t care what theory you cite or what hashtags you use. I don’t believe in utopia. I believe in less suffering. I believe in more grace. I believe in not making things worse.
That’s the kind of commie I am. I’m not here to control what you say. I’m not interested in managing your behavior. I don’t think history is a weapon to swing at strangers. I believe in shared struggle, not curated outrage. I’ve seen hunger up close. I know who dies in every war. I light candles not to be seen, but to keep going. I don’t believe the system can be redeemed by etiquette or HR or rebranding. I believe the system is a lie, and people still matter.
You don’t have to agree with me. I’m not trying to convert you. I’m trying to say something true while I still can.
I’m the kind of commie who meant it when I read Debs. I’m the kind who saw where things were headed when I read Vonnegut. And I’m the kind who’s done pretending any of this is a game.
Amen.
Appendix — Historical & Cultural Context
1. Who Was Kurt Vonnegut?
Kurt Vonnegut was born in Indianapolis on November 11, 1922, and died in New York City on April 11, 2007. He came from a line of German-American freethinkers and developed a secular, deeply humanist worldview that rejected supernaturalism while retaining a near-religious commitment to decency and dignity. Though not religious in any orthodox sense, he identified as a “Christ-loving atheist” and sometimes attended Unitarian Universalist services. His ethical stance was simple: behave decently, without expecting divine reward. That belief carried through everything he wrote.
Vonnegut served in World War II, survived the firebombing of Dresden as a prisoner of war, and returned home with a clear-eyed view of the absurdity and cruelty embedded in modern institutions—especially the military and the state. This experience shaped his voice: darkly satirical, skeptical of authority, morally serious beneath all the comedy.
Politically, Vonnegut rejected both mainstream liberalism and conservatism. He aligned himself with socialism, or at least a secular moral socialism grounded in the dignity of the individual and the shared burdens of society. He frequently cited Eugene Debs as a personal hero and moral compass, quoting Debs’s famous line: “While there is a lower class, I am in it; while there is a criminal element, I am of it; while there is a soul in prison, I am not free.”
Vonnegut’s work includes a long list of novels—Player Piano (1952), The Sirens of Titan (1959), Mother Night (1962), Cat’s Cradle (1963), God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater (1965), Slaughterhouse-Five (1969), Breakfast of Champions (1973), Slapstick (1976), Jailbird (1979), Deadeye Dick (1982), Galápagos (1985), Bluebeard (1987), Hocus Pocus (1990), and Timequake (1997). His short story collections include Canary in a Cat House, Welcome to the Monkey House, Bagombo Snuff Box, Look at the Birdie, While Mortals Sleep, and the posthumous Complete Stories collection. His nonfiction includes Fates Worse Than Death (1991), a blend of memoir and political reflection, and A Man Without a Country (2005), a searing indictment of American imperialism and Bush-era moral collapse.
A major documentary, Kurt Vonnegut: Unstuck in Time, was released in 2021 and frames his life not just as a literary one, but as a political and philosophical case study in postwar American dissent. His worldview remains a mixture of pacifism, absurdism, satire, and heartfelt concern for the ordinary person crushed by systems too large to comprehend, let alone reform.
2. Who Was Eugene V. Debs?
Eugene Victor Debs was born in Terre Haute, Indiana, on November 5, 1855, and died on October 20, 1926. He began working at age 14 as a locomotive fireman, gaining firsthand experience with the brutal conditions faced by industrial laborers in the Gilded Age. By the 1880s, he helped found the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and eventually became a national voice for American labor through his leadership of the American Railway Union, which he co-founded in 1893.
Debs gained national attention during the 1894 Pullman Strike, where his union challenged the power of the rail companies. The federal government crushed the strike with military force, and Debs was jailed for six months. His time in prison radicalized him. He emerged a committed socialist and began organizing workers on a national scale through the Socialist Party of America.
In 1918, Debs gave a speech in Canton, Ohio, criticizing U.S. involvement in World War I and encouraging working men not to fight and die for the ambitions of bankers and politicians. For this, he was charged under the Espionage Act and sentenced to ten years in prison. He ran for president in 1920 while incarcerated, receiving nearly one million votes—approximately 3% of the national total.
Debs was deeply influenced by Marx but grounded in the specific cultural and labor landscape of the American Midwest. He was not a theorist; he was an orator and moralist who understood that the working class needed more than ideas—it needed language, courage, and solidarity. He emphasized shared material struggle, not identity politics. He championed dignity, not bureaucracy.
His legacy endured far beyond his death. He became a secular saint of the American labor movement and an enduring symbol for class-based solidarity. His words still appear on union banners and in the speeches of modern democratic socialists. Bernie Sanders has called him one of the greatest Americans who ever lived, and Vonnegut treated him with near-religious reverence.
3. Were They Populists or Identity-Based Thinkers?
Debs was a working-class populist in the clearest sense of the word. He spoke plainly to ordinary people and grounded his politics in their lives—not in abstractions, not in language games. His speeches were full of metaphors like “grit,” “sand,” and “muscle,” not academic jargon. His politics were built around class, not race, gender, or status. He believed in organizing by material reality, not cultural identity.
Vonnegut, though more abstract in his method, was also a populist. His satire took aim at the military, government, academia, and capitalism—but it always sympathized with the ordinary person trying to survive within those systems. His characters were rarely heroic in the conventional sense; they were broken, absurd, self-defeating, and human. He mocked identity politics before it had a name—not because he denied injustice, but because he knew it could be used to distract from material struggle. In both style and substance, Vonnegut believed the problem was never difference; it was cruelty, hierarchy, and the indifference of institutions.
4. Cultural and Political Context (Chronological)
Eugene Debs was born in 1855 during the rise of American industrial capitalism. By the 1870s, he was working on the railroads, organizing labor, and witnessing the concentration of wealth and political power in the hands of a few. His activism emerged in a country with no labor protections, no safety net, and no patience for dissent.
The 1894 Pullman Strike catapulted him into the national spotlight, and after being jailed, he turned toward socialism as the only moral response to a system he saw as fundamentally rigged. From 1900 to 1920, Debs ran for president five times on the Socialist Party ticket. After his imprisonment in 1918 for anti-war speech, he ran one last campaign from his prison cell in 1920, cementing his place in the pantheon of American radicals. He died in 1926, beloved by workers, reviled by the powerful.
Kurt Vonnegut was born in 1922, just four years before Debs died. He came of age in the aftermath of the Great Depression and fought in World War II. His literary career began in the 1950s with Player Piano, a novel about automation and the corporate dehumanization of labor. The ‘60s and ‘70s saw his most iconic works—Mother Night, Cat’s Cradle, Slaughterhouse-Five, and Breakfast of Champions—all of which critiqued war, profit, science, religion, and American exceptionalism.
He died in 2007, but his work became newly relevant in the years that followed: amid war, surveillance, austerity, and cultural atomization, Vonnegut’s blend of moral seriousness and absurdity read more like prophecy than fiction.
5. Selected Works and Adaptations
Debs’s speeches remain among the most quoted in American political history. His 1918 Canton speech and sentencing statement (“While there is a lower class…”) are still taught in labor studies, radical history, and political philosophy courses. His presidential campaigns—especially his 1920 run from prison—are legendary in the socialist tradition.
Vonnegut’s bibliography includes the major novels listed above, as well as shorter works like Welcome to the Monkey House, Bagombo Snuff Box, Armageddon in Retrospect, and God Bless You, Dr. Kevorkian. His nonfiction—especially Fates Worse Than Death and A Man Without a Country—captures his late-life political clarity and disillusionment. His 1970s play Happy Birthday, Wanda June further explores American violence and moral cowardice. The 1972 film adaptation of Slaughterhouse-Five is considered a classic of anti-war cinema, and the 2021 documentary Kurt Vonnegut: Unstuck in Time offers an intimate view of his life, contradictions, and lasting cultural impact.
6. Fact Check Summary — Verified Claims
Vonnegut’s Unitarian, humanist, and freethinker identity is true and well documented across interviews, letters, and biographies.
Vonnegut’s admiration for Eugene Debs is not exaggerated; he quoted Debs frequently in speeches and essays.
Debs ran for president five times (1900–1920) on the Socialist Party ticket—factually accurate.
Debs was imprisoned for anti-war speech in 1918 and ran for president from prison in 1920, earning roughly 3% of the popular vote.
Vonnegut rejected revolution as a goal but was sharply critical of war, bureaucracy, and corporate systems—his humanism was explicit.
The listed works and publication dates for both men are accurate per primary sources.
tl;dr Summary
The author identifies as "whatever kind of commie Kurt Vonnegut was," clarifying that this is not the kind associated with ideological purity, party loyalty, abolishing excellence, or turning sacred things into slogans. Instead, it's rooted in the basic principle that the world should not be built on cruelty.
The core beliefs of this "communism" include:
Dignity is a human right, not a market variable.
No one should be discarded for lack of measurable productivity.
Suffering should never be made efficient.
Nobody should be punished for being poor.
This aligns with Kurt Vonnegut's approach, which focused on telling the truth about systems that crush people and those who ignore it. Vonnegut exposed the deceit of patriotism, professional-class hypocrisy, and the myth that cruelty serves any noble purpose. He satirized institutions but always pointed to a moral baseline, holding deep reverence for figures like Eugene Debs.
Eugene Debs is presented as a central figure and moral compass for both Vonnegut and the author. Debs went to prison for stating that poor men should not be forced to kill other poor men in war for the enrichment of the wealthy. He even campaigned for president from his prison cell, garnering nearly a million votes. For the author, Debs represents moral alignment rather than mere politics.
The author observes that American politics has become hollow, with justice reduced to compliance rituals, equity to corporate HR strategies, and the language of liberation co-opted. They note a shift where the "professional class" talks about power without confronting it, and the working poor are ignored or pathologized. The author describes a personal experience of being labeled "fascist" for not conforming to new political "catechisms," asserting that they didn't change, but "The Left did."
Becoming "anti-anti-Trump" in 2016 was not an endorsement of Trump, but a rejection of an opposition seen as prioritizing performance, posture, and branding over substantive issues like wages, housing, healthcare, and war. This opposition, in the author's view, disliked populism more than inequality and was more bothered by rudeness than by endless war or corporate corruption, effectively defending a class rather than the people.
The author's "kind of communism" is grounded in material reality:
Feeding workers.
Housing families.
Caring for the sick.
Ending wars.
Holding liars accountable.
Preventing cruelty from becoming polite.
Prioritizing ethics over etiquette.
They emphasize a belief in less suffering, more grace, and not making things worse, rejecting utopian ideals. This perspective avoids controlling others' speech or behavior, viewing history as a shared struggle rather than a weapon. The author states that the system is a lie, and people still matter.
Both Kurt Vonnegut and Eugene Debs were figures who championed ordinary people. Vonnegut, a German-American freethinker, humanist, and "Christ-loving atheist," survived the firebombing of Dresden in WWII, which shaped his anti-war and satirical voice. He rejected mainstream political labels, embracing socialism and humanism. Debs, a locomotive fireman who saw harsh labor conditions, became a key labor organizer, notably leading the 1894 Pullman Strike and later becoming a committed socialist. He was imprisoned for an anti-war speech in 1918. Both were considered populists: Debs spoke directly to laborers focusing on class and material justice, while Vonnegut's satire critiqued structures that harmed ordinary people, emphasizing that the problem was cruelty and hierarchy, not difference.
Share this post