Let’s get real: The world’s two most powerful nations are building surveillance societies. The United States, under the influence of a new breed of techno-ideologues, is quietly constructing a digital architecture of control that mirrors—sometimes eerily, sometimes ironically—the system perfected by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Pull back the curtain and you’ll see the same machinery: data, algorithms, and the relentless drive to know, score, and shape every citizen. The difference? Only in the branding and the story we tell ourselves.
Peter Thiel: Architect of America's "Surveil and Punish" Ambitions
To understand this convergence, you have to understand Peter Thiel—a billionaire investor, PayPal co-founder, and the intellectual godfather of the New Right. Thiel isn’t just a financier; he’s a philosopher-king for a new era of American power. His books, speeches, and strategic investments have seeded a generation of politicians, tech entrepreneurs, and policy architects who share his skepticism of democracy, his faith in hierarchy, and his fascination with the management of human desire.
Thiel’s influence is everywhere: from his early support of Donald Trump to his funding of “anti-woke” candidates and his investments in companies that provide the backbone of America’s surveillance state. He’s the bridge between Silicon Valley’s monopolists and the populist Right—a connector of memes, money, and power.
1. Surveillance: The Water We Swim In
We used to think surveillance was something the CCP did to its citizens. But the same technologies that the CCP uses to monitor dissidents are now tracking American gig workers, protestors, and, increasingly, immigrants and minorities. Since 2016, surveillance in the US has expanded dramatically—not just at the border, but in cities and online. ICE and DHS powered by the Memetic Engineering Complex (think Meta, X, Amazon, Google, OpenAI, talk radio, and the advertising/PR industry), began scraping social media to flag “risky” posts, not just from non-citizens but from US citizens with immigrant heritage and even just “dangerous” beliefs contrary to the current Administration’s policies.
Trump’s executive orders empowered DHS to use any “publicly available information”—including tweets, Facebook posts, and even private messages obtained through warrants—to build cases for deportation. The chilling effect was immediate: immigrant communities began self-censoring, deleting posts, and warning each other that “anything you say online can and will be used against you.”
2. Thought Policing and Social Media
The Memetic Engineering Complex doesn’t just sell ads—they sell influence. Their algorithms are designed to maximize engagement by amplifying outrage, envy, and tribalism. Since 2016, these platforms have increasingly become tools for both state and mob enforcement of ideological conformity. Over the past decade, people who posted anti-vax, anti-lockdown, pro-Palistinian or anti-Trump views, depending on the year found themselves doxxed, harassed, or even targeted by ICE or local police.
“When you have a government that can collect massive amounts of information—who you’re calling, who you’re associating with, what books you’ve purchased, what websites you’re visiting—that data becomes a powerful instrument for control. It doesn’t have to be used for heavy-handed prosecutions; the mere existence of it creates a society of caution, suspicion, and conformity.”
— Rand Paul
Predictive policing, powered by these platforms’ data, was used to monitor protests and flag “potential agitators.” In some cities, local governments partnered with tech firms to map “networks of influence” among activists—an approach straight out of the CCP’s playbook for dissent control.
3. State-Corporate Fusion: The New Leviathan
The CCP compels tech companies to share everything with the state. In the US, the state contracts out its surveillance, but the effect is the same: a seamless flow of data from your phone, your bank, your face, into the hands of power. The “public-private partnership” is the new ideology, and it’s bipartisan.
Peter Thiel, while fearing mimetic desire and philosophically in favor using elite control to suppress it, fully recognizes and embraces its power to help him achieve his longer-term goal of control of the chaotic masses by a small group of “CEO Kings”. Ever the contrarian, he sees the chaos and violence that arises from metastasizing mimetic desire this as inevitable and even desirable. His investments in Palantir and Facebook are not contradictions—they are the logical extension of his belief in monopoly, hierarchy, and the management of mimetic desire. Trump and his circle see in these tools the means to restore “order” and “greatness,” even as they rail against “big tech” in public.
“At a time when these platforms are determining elections, banning inconvenient political views, lining politicians’ pockets with hundreds of millions of dollars, and addicting our kids to screens, I want to draw attention to the robber barons of the modern era, this is the fight to recover America's populist democracy”
— Josh Hawley
4. Targeting Immigrants and Minorities: The Universal Playbook
The CCP’s use of surveillance to control Uyghurs and dissidents is well-documented. In the US, under Trump, ICE used social media monitoring and predictive analytics to build cases against immigrants and even US citizens with immigrant backgrounds. Reports surfaced of people being detained or deported based on old tweets, Facebook posts, or even their associations online.
The logic is the same: identify, isolate, neutralize. The difference is only in mechanics and branding.
5. Philosophical Rhetoric: Harmony vs. Order
The CCP speaks of “harmony,” “stability,” and “national rejuvenation.” Trump, Thiel, and the Right speak of “order,” “security,” and “American greatness.” Both are code for control, for the management of risk, for the channeling the potential violence of mimetic desire away from the powerful and toward acceptable targets.
Thiel’s open skepticism of democracy—his belief that “competition is for losers” and that freedom and democracy may be incompatible—mirrors the CCP’s distrust of pluralism and dissent. Both see the crowd as dangerous, the individual as a potential threat, and the solution as hierarchy, surveillance, and the management of desire.
“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.”
—Harry Truman
6. Denial and Camouflage: The American Way
The CCP is honest about its authoritarianism. The US Administration cloaks it in the language of “law & order” and “securing our borders”, but is the same fundamental approach in slightly different wrapping.
7. The Endgame: No Place to Hide
Where does this convergence leave us? In a world where the infrastructure of control is global, modular, and for sale to the highest bidder. Where the line between “free” and “unfree” is blurred by data, and the only real difference is who gets to pull the levers.
“The greatest threat to freedom, even in today's perilous times, comes from no foreign foe. It comes from a dangerous habit many of our leaders fell into over several generations -- letting the power and the resources that are the basis of freedom slip from the grassroots America into the hands of a remote central authority.”
— President Ronald Reagan
In the end, the American and CCP systems are not opposites. They are reflections—each learning from, competing with, and ultimately resembling the other. The real question is not which is worse, but whether we can imagine a future where data empowers rather than imprisons, and where the management of desire serves freedom rather than power.
📌 Appendix: Counterpoint, Context & Critical Analysis
⚖️ 1. Big Picture Counterpoint
Let’s step back. The essay above argues that the US and China are basically mirror images: two surveillance states fighting for the same power over desire, behavior, and dissent. But that’s too neat.
Key difference: The CCP is a one-party authoritarian state. There’s no free press, no independent judiciary, no elections that mean anything.
In the US, the surveillance machine is real, but so are the brakes: courts, leaks, journalists, lawsuits, the messiness of Congress. It’s not a get-out-of-jail card, but it matters.
Carrot vs. Stick: America’s version sells you the convenience of being watched — “give us your data, we’ll give you dopamine.” The CCP’s version is more stick: social credit, direct punishment, re-education.
🪞 2. Popular Rebuttal: “Surveillance Capitalism ≠ Surveillance State”
Some call it surveillance capitalism (Zuboff).
The real driver here is profit. Algorithms and data flows shape behavior for ad clicks, not necessarily for ideological loyalty.
Companies like Meta, X, Google, Amazon, OpenAI feed on your engagement, outrage, tribal drama. They don’t answer to a single Party Chairman.
🔍 3. Fact Check Highlights
✅ True:
ICE did scrape social media to find immigrants’ “risky” posts.
Predictive policing flagged activists.
Peter Thiel has been openly skeptical of democracy.
❌ Overstated:
America’s “same machinery, same result” is too pat. There are constitutional limits. Activists do fight back.
“No place to hide” ignores encryption, GDPR, FOIA, privacy lawsuits, open-source tools like Signal and Tor.
🧩 4. Contextual Threads & Tangles
Thiel & Trump: It’s not a unified front. The GOP is split — libertarians hate mass surveillance, populists love “law & order.”
State vs. Corporate: China compels corporate data sharing. America contracts out. Same outcome? Not quite: there’s still friction, court battles, leaks.
The “Woke” Side: Big Tech censors conservatives sometimes — but it censors leftists, Palestinians, anti-vax voices too. It’s a chaos machine, not a monolith.
🧭 5. My China Take
I don’t see China as my cartoon villain.
They think in centuries. They test, adapt, respond to carrot and stick.
Americans have painted the CCP as a Bond villain for decades — but they’re more practical than evil.
Yes, they’re authoritarian. But they’re also nationalists, realists, and they watch the US with a mix of fear and amusement.
📚 6. FAQ
Q: Is Peter Thiel really anti-democracy?
A: He’s publicly questioned whether freedom and democracy can coexist. He once wrote: “Competition is for losers.”
Q: Did the US copy China’s surveillance playbook?
A: The tech is similar; the incentives and constraints are not. One’s for profit, the other’s for absolute control.
Q: Did Trump expand surveillance?
A: ICE and DHS used social media in new ways. Biden’s admin has not reversed all of it.
Q: Can we resist?
A: Privacy tech, strong data laws, whistleblowers, and relentless pushback all work. Encryption is still legal — for now.
🗂️ 7. Glossary
Mimetic Desire: René Girard’s idea that we want what others want — and that this spreads conflict.
CCP: Chinese Communist Party.
Palantir: Data-mining company co-founded by Thiel; powers parts of US defense & immigration data.
ICE/DHS: Immigration and Customs Enforcement / Department of Homeland Security.
Surveillance Capitalism: Monetizing personal data to predict and shape behavior.
🧑🎓 8. Who’s Who
Peter Thiel: Billionaire, PayPal/Facebook/Palantir, New Right intellectual, democracy skeptic.
Donald Trump: 45th & 47th President. Expanded immigration surveillance, positioned as “anti-big tech” while benefiting from its chaos.
René Girard: Philosopher behind “mimetic desire.”
Shoshana Zuboff: Coined “surveillance capitalism.” Her book shaped how this whole debate is framed.
🧵 9. The Real Question
Where do we go from here?
Surveillance is here to stay. The question is whether it imprisons or empowers.
Data can chain us to hierarchy — or build a freer future, if we keep dragging it into the light.
The coin doesn’t just have two sides — it spins.
✅ Final Note
I stand by every word above — and I stand ready to argue with myself tomorrow.
Use this appendix however you want: fact-check it, fight it, ignore it, or build on it.
We deserve more than cheap mirrors.
Silicon Valley and the CCP: Two Sides of the Same Coin
The provided text explores the convergence of surveillance practices in the United States and China, arguing that both nations are developing sophisticated digital control architectures. It suggests that despite differences in branding and political systems, the underlying machinery of data collection and algorithmic control is remarkably similar. The author highlights the influence of figures like Peter Thiel in shaping America's approach to surveillance, particularly in the context of state-corporate partnerships and the targeting of immigrants and minorities. A critical appendix offers counterpoints and nuances, distinguishing between a purely authoritarian state and one where profit motives and existing legal frameworks play a significant role, while still acknowledging the expansion of surveillance.
Share this post